Sunday, February 26, 2012

I am not a Serial Killer – Dan Wells


Tor, Copyright 2010, 271 pages
ISBN: 978-0-7653-2782-6
Read: May 2011 (at age 33)
First time read

If you haven’t read it:

John Wayne Cleaver is trying really hard not to be a serial killer.  He is a sociopath.  But he’s trying…  This is the first book of a trilogy – the other two are Mr. Monster and I Don’t Want to Kill You.  If you don’t have a bit of a dark sense of humour, it might be a bit much.  I loved it.

From the back cover:

Fear the darkness within…

John Wayne Cleaver is dangerous, and he knows it.  He’s spent his life doing his best not to live up to his potential.

He’s obsessed with serial killers, but really doesn’t want to become one.  So for his own sake, and the safety of those around him, he lives by rigid rules he’s written for himself, practicing normal life as if it were a private religion that could save him from damnation.

Dead bodies are normal to John.  He likes them, actually.  They don’t demand or expect the empathy he’s unable to offer.  Perhaps that’s what gives him the objectivity to recognize that there’s something different about the body the police have just found behind the Wash-n-Dry Laundromat - and to appreciate what the difference means.

Now, for the first time, John has to confront a danger outside himself, a threat he can’t control, a menace to everything and everyone he would love, if only he could.

Reactions below the break:

Overall:
I picked up this book because I’ve been listening to the Writing Excuses podcast for a few years now, and Dan Wells is one of the hosts of the podcast.  The authors use their own works as examples quite regularly, and I wanted to see what he was talking about.

I loved the book – the characters were extremely well done, the plot was scary enough, but not over-the-top, and the first-person main character’s worst enemy was himself in a terrifically creepy way.  I don’t have a lot to say about this one, other than it was good.

Rating:  5 

Characters: 
The strongest part of a strong book – our hero was fantastically creepy.  The supporting characters were well-rounded and fleshed out.  The big bad guy was surprisingly sympathetic.  It was just all good.

Plot:
In this book, the main plot (stalk and kill the monster) was well done, but seemed almost an afterthought in importance to the main character’s battle against himself.  It worked very well.

Premise: 
A serial killer is stalking the small town our hero lives in – and our sociopathic hero needs to let himself kill in order to save his town.  But once he starts, can he stop?  It’s really a fascinating take on the monster-hunter genre.

Setting: 
Small town America – with a bit of the supernatural thrown in for kicks.  It was well done. 

Readability: 
Generally excellent – good pacing, good tension, clear, fluid writing.  I didn’t like one spot, early on, where, in the middle of a present presentation of the story, we got “of course, we didn’t know that at the time”.  This, of course, is one of the big twists in the book – I didn’t mind the twist, but I didn’t like the way it was handled.  I would have preferred the twist happening a bit more in the action.  Amazing what one throwaway line can do, I guess.

Other opinions:
There are a bunch – here are a few that I enjoyed.  I couldn’t find any negative ones to balance things out:
Tor.com – Perhaps a bit biased, coming as it does from the publisher’s website, but very well written.


No comments:

Post a Comment