ISBN: 088677-198-6
Read: November 2010 (at age 32)
Second time read
What this book is:
This is a mostly standalone book – space
opera, with shades of Sparta
v. Athens . It’s followed by The Wilding, which was not written until 2004, and takes place 200
years after In Conquest Born (from
the back cover), so I expect that these two books will share a setting more
than being part of a the same story.
From the back cover:
“They
were the ultimate enemies, generals of star empires forever opposed – and
worlds would fall before their private war…
My comments: (spoilers ahoy!)
Overall:
I’d picked up the sequel,
The Wilding, and I figured I should read the first one again for some background to book 2. I’d read this book once before, in High
School, I think, and I liked it then, so I was interested to see how it was on
re-read. Unfortunately, it
didn’t age as well as I’d hoped. The
themes were big – Interstellar war between two huge star empires, the nature of
humanity, genocide, the value of competition, things like that – and it just
didn’t click for me this time through. I
felt that the settings weren’t well developed, the characters developed in fits
and starts, the final reveals and confrontations were confusing and a bit of a
let down, and a major epilogue was needed to explain one of the main mysteries
of the book. I much preferred the Coldfire series of books – Black Sun Rising, When True Night Falls ,
and Crown of Shadows – to this
book, and would suggest starting there when reading this author.
Rating: 3
Characters:
Fair.
Neither main character was sympathetic, in that they were both vicious
superhuman individuals fuelled mostly by hatred. At one point, early in the book, I stopped
and thought, “It’s pretty amazing that she (Friedman) can write a compelling
book with main characters that I dislike so much.” Eventually, the characters just got old, and
the story didn’t compensate for them.
The supporting characters tended to be
flat, and forgettable. They were there simply to allow the main characters to show their natures. The naming scheme was hard to remember, which
didn’t help with keeping track of specific characters, either.
Premise:
Fair.
On the surface – two powerful people from opposed cultures war on each
other. This was a good start. The main symbolism that I saw in the book was
how competition, especially deadly competition, makes both parties to the
competition stronger. This was shown
through the Braxin v. Azean conflicts, the Zatar v. Anzha conflict, and various
other conflicts shown within the Braxin and Azean cultures. It was a good starting point, but I think it
really needed a “so what” at the conclusion of the story. It kind of tapered off into a “but neither
can win” situation that may be trying to say that there’s value in competition
to a point, but if it goes too far, it can be mutually destructive. I don’t know.
There wasn’t much punch to it, anyhow.
Setting:
Fair.
The book was set in interstellar space in the far distant future. The Braxin culture and people were well
defined and clearly describe, and worked well.
The Azeans, much less so. Part of
that was that the Azean character, Anzha, did not really fit in with her
culture so the opportunity to show the culture didn’t exist. It felt like a hole in the story,
anyway.
The magic system (psionics) seemed to
change based on plot requirements, too. I wasn’t a fan.
The alien cultures were superb, though –
they were all wonderfully alien, varied enough to be believable. The characters tended to think their cultures
well, also.
Plot:
Fair.
I think that there was just too much going on in this book to be able to
fit it all into one book. There were
snippets here and there and characters popping in for a first-person section
and then gone back to the background for the rest of the book, and the whole
thing just felt disjointed.
To be fair, the book was a balancing act
trying to not make either of the main characters more sympathetic than the
other – the symmetry needed to be maintained for the theme of the story – but
the overall picture just left me wanting more.
Readability:
Good.
The writing was well done, and the pacing was pretty good – things were
always happening to keep the pages turning.
In this printing, the copy editor had some problems – word substitutions
and misspellings happened rather more frequently than I like to see. Other than that, though, the book flowed all
right.
Other views:
A nice story re-cap and introduction, not much for opinions.
Seems like a similar reaction to mine.
Read for the same reasons as me, liked the book a bit better.
No comments:
Post a Comment