Sunday, November 25, 2012

Elantris – Brandon Sanderson


Tor, Copyright 2005, 638 pages
ISBN: 978-0-7653-5037-4
Read: July 2011 (at age 33)
First time read

If you haven’t read it

This book is a stand-alone story.  It’s high fantasy, involving the fall of a divine city and the people who try to bring it back.  Or survive.  Or tear it down completely.

From the back cover:

Elantris was the city of the gods.  What power could have cursed it?

Raoden, prince of Arelon, was loved by all, including the princess he’d never met.  Where has he gone?

Hrathen, high priest of Fjordell, will convert the people of Arelon or kill them.  How will he decide?

Sarene, princess of Teod, was a widow before she was ever married.  Who can stand against her?

And a whole bunch of blurbs – on the back cover, on the front cover, and the first two pages inside.  The blurbs didn’t do anything other than irritate me.  Usually, when there are more blurbs than plot summary, I set the book back down.  I picked this book up and took it to the till because I’ve enjoyed listening to the author on his podcast, and I wanted to see what his book was like, rather than hearing about it secondhand.

Reactions below the break:

I think that I’m just the wrong reader for Brandon Sanderson’s books.  I had essentially the same reactions after both Mistborn and Elantris.  The setting was really cool.  The characters were good by the end, and it felt like the beginning was just there because it had to be in order for the good parts at the end to make sense.  Most of my complaints are from the early part of the book – by the end, either things had changed, or I got used to the problems, and they faded into insignificance beside the strong points. 

One gripe:
I really didn’t like the dialogue, early, when the world was being unveiled.  It felt forced, like the author needed to get these three facts about the world or the characters to come up, and warped the sentences accordingly.  It also felt… maybe ‘glib’ is the right word.  People talked too much.  And explained too much.

One rave:
The premise was fantastic.  It was awesome having one of the main characters waking up dead, and then having to explore his new world, and the rest of the various motivations that followed the initial conditions worked very well. 

Rating:  3 

Characters: 
The characters were wonderful ideas on paper, but I didn’t really buy into them, early in the book, anyway.  Once the book got done telling me who the people were and why they were acting the way they were, and just let them get on with what they were doing, then they were pretty good.  Early on, though, it just didn’t work for me.

Plot: 
There were a few nice twists along the way.  Pacing was good.  There were lots of different plotlines that intertwined quite well.

Premise: 
Let’s see if I can boil this down:

·         Something’s wrong in the city of the gods – all the gods are dead, and what’s left in the city are cursed shadows of former people. 
·         The princess wants to carve out a niche for herself, as well as find out what happened to the husband she’s never met, the prince. 
·         The prince wants to survive, and save the dead city that he’s stuck in.
·         A visiting cleric has the whole mess slated for either extinction or conversion. 
·         And, of course, status quo is busy trying to resist change. 

It’s a pretty complex setup, and it worked well, once it was set up.

Setting: 
The setting was very strong – but there were a few unnecessary/irritating things thrown in.  The first one that pops to mind is that the “bad religion” had taken over the whole world except the two little countries where our heroes were from.  It wasn’t enough that they were an expanding empire run by a priest/king, trying to gobble up the small neighbors – they had to already have taken over the entire world (other than that last little bit) first.  It made the world seem small and unrealistic – the Romans, who had a pretty good empire going on, didn’t ever conquer everywhere. Neither did the Mongols.  Or the Chinese.  It’s a small thing, but it bugged me.  Otherwise – the “fallen city of the gods” was really neat.  The bad religion worked very well, as did the good religion.

Readability: 
It wasn't a difficult read, and passed by quickly despite my irritation with the book in the early going, and being incredibly busy with a new baby on the way and a whole bunch of jobs that needed doing first.  It hooked me soundly by the end, and the last couple hundred pages just flew by.
  
Other reactions:
Great review.  Lots of fun.  I wish I’d written it.

A bit deeper. Balanced review.

Another good, balanced review.

There are lots like this one – It’s all great! Read the book!

Balanced, positive review.

This seems to be a heavily reviewed book.

No comments:

Post a Comment