Monday, October 21, 2013

Water for Elephants – Sara Gruen

Harper Perennial, copyright 2006, printed 2007, 331 pages
ISBN: 978-0-00-639155-5
Read: September 2012, at age 34

It’s a standalone historical fiction, set in the Great Depression.  In a circus.  And also, a nursing home.

From the dust jacket:

Orphaned and penniless at the height of the Depression, Jacob Jankowski escapes everything he knows by jumping on a passing train – and inadvertently runs away with the circus.  Thrown into the chaos of a second-rate travelling show, Jacob is adrift in a world of freaks, swindlers, and misfits.

Jacob uses his veterinary skills in the circus menagerie and becomes a savior for the animals he so loves, including a baffling elephant named Rosie.  He also comes to know Marlena, the enchanting star of the equestrian act – and wife of August, a charismatic but cruel animal trainer.  Caught between his love for Marlena and his need for belonging, Jacob is freed only by a murderous secret that will bring the big top down.

My reactions – A few spoilers, too, but not too bad. 
One good thing:  The setting was fantastic, fantastical, and fantastically described.

One bad thing:  I didn't fully buy into the main character.  He was… a bit off.  It’s hard to describe, but his thought patterns and reactions didn't quite ring true to me.

Overall:

It was a wonderful book, with a rich setting that was wonderfully described, larger-than-life characters, and expressive writing that was beautiful in places, crude in others, and wonderfully well done.  It also kept kicking me out of the book.  I’d have two hours to read, and I would read for half an hour and then set the book down, and leave it down for a week.  This came down to a of plotting choice – the story is two intertwined first-person narratives – one set in the thirties (the circus story), and one about now (the nursing home) – with the same, but appropriately aged main character.  Part of it was that, while I was reading, it was wonderfully immersive, but when I set it down, it didn't eat at me.  There was no tension.  The other was that just when the circus story was getting good, we’d switch back to the nursing home.  And I’d put the book down, because I just didn't care about the nursing home.  When I got to the end of the book, I can understand that choice – the nursing home is the main story, and the circus story is just background for the real story.  I didn't understand that until the end, and I’m not sure the payoff is worth the lack of tension through the rest of it.

Rating: 4

Characters:

The characters were generally larger-than-life, and painted with pretty broad strokes – Marlena was the sweetheart, August was the paranoid-schizophrenic boss/obstacle to Marlena.  Big Al was the unscrupulous greedy owner, etc.  They worked, because it made sense for the main character to see them that way.  The main character – he was a bit tougher.  As a 93 year old, he was wonderful.  As a 23 year old… most of the time he was great.  And then he’d be a bit off with something.  His thought might have been too coherent for the situation, or just… wrong.  It’s very difficult for me to put a finger on it, but there was just something off. 

Setting:

A travelling circus in the Great Depression.  Not something I've read before, and very, very well done.

Plot:

The plot was generally well done, but interrupted.  The nursing home sections tended to drag the story down, and I wonder if there were too many of them.  It might have worked better to have an intro (nursing home), main story (circus) and then an epilogue back in the nursing home.  I think it would have gotten the point across, and wouldn't have kicked me out of the story so often.

Readability:

Wonderful writing.  Fantastic when I was reading it, but the plotting and pacing detracted from the reading experience.

Other Opinions:

History and Other Thoughts
Didn't like the characters much.  Similar read to mine.

Mere Musings
Not a fan at all.

Lots of other reviews, but these were the ones I liked best.  Most were either "This book was fantastic.  I wish I could give it more than 10/10!" or "It was a good book.  Well researched, but a bit off on execution."



No comments:

Post a Comment